一路 BBS

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 41|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

About That Japan Deal

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 7-23-2025 10:36:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 choi 于 7-23-2025 10:56 编辑

Paul Jrugman, About That Japan Deal, July 23, 2025 (blog)
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/about-that-japan-deal
("Some people have looked at the relatively muted effect of tariffs on [America's] consumer prices so far * * * If foreigners were eating the tariffs, we'd expect to see a large decline in the prices America is paying for imports. And the BLS [Bureau of Labor Statics, US Department of Labor] does, in fact, measure import prices; its index specifically does not include tariffs")

My comment: I do not understand the third point. Cross that. Clcik the hyperkink in the quotation, you will see a graph from 2005 to 2025, every other year in between (all year displaying June ONLY). Unknowst to me at first, I learn that I can click individual line segment above the graph that are colored differently. Once you click "nonfuel import," you will see not much difference between 2005 and 2025 (though the figure in this blog says slight increase). Brcause these nonfuel import prices (by BLS) do not include tariff, so the real non-fuel import prices, after tariff, should be high (because foreign exporters are NOT eating tariffs; if they had eaten tariffs, the nonfuel import prices would have decreased), but domestic consumer prices in the United States have not increased. Krugman surmises that so far, nobody (Americans or foreigners) are eating tariffs, because American importers must have imported enough to stock up in advance.  
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表